Reference and attribution
Case Studies
Kaohsiung’s 1999 Civic Dashboard and the Taipei City Dashboard are the most direct references for Hualien. What we borrow is the method, not the screens.
Any reuse of screenshots from case studies must credit the source. Drawing our own illustrative diagrams is preferred to avoid infringement.
Requirement §5.2
Two cities’ approaches and the Hualien plan
The table below compares each case: the case, what we learn from it, and the Hualien approach. Every row carries its attribution and an official link.
| Case | What we learn | Hualien approach |
|---|---|---|
| 高雄 1999 市政儀表板Open the official dashboard （另開新視窗） | 依案件類型呈現問題分布；公開處理完成率與平均時間；去識別化後顯示陳情熱點 | 串接市長信箱與報修 |
| 臺北城市儀表板Open the official dashboard （另開新視窗） | 交通、工程、環境可切換圖層；圖表、地圖與歷史資料相互對照 | 模組化建置、逐步擴充；每項資料標示來源與更新日期來源：臺北城市儀表板（https://citydashboard.taipei/）。畫面引用須標示出處；建議優先自行繪製示意圖，避免侵權。 |
Reuse policy
How we handle other people’s screens
- No screenshots, images or iframes from other websites are embedded; this page uses text and official links only.
- Cited screens must credit the source; where we cite one, we will show the retrieval date and confirm permission.
- We draw our own illustrative diagrams first, labelled as conceptual mock-ups.
- Our own charts will always carry the data source, update date and responsible unit.
The above are suggested directions. Every link and version must be individually verified before formal citation.
This page contains no image or embedded screen from another website, so nothing here can be mistaken for this site’s own output.